{"id":8429,"date":"2021-03-30T18:31:12","date_gmt":"2021-03-30T16:31:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/"},"modified":"2021-03-30T18:31:12","modified_gmt":"2021-03-30T16:31:12","slug":"2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/","title":{"rendered":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>&#8230;or the Balance between Artistic Movements, Free Artistic Expression and Copyright Law<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\">On 23 February<i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(1) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>the Paris Court of Appeal<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>upheld the decision of the High Court of Paris of 8 November 2018\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>condemning the American visual artist<\/b><\/span>, the highly-rated Jeff Koons, and the Centre Pompidou in Paris\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>for infringing<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>a Naf-Naf advertising campaign dating from 1985. This is not the first time that the artist has been penalized in France and abroad. Thus in December 2019<i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(2) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>, the Paris Court of Appeal had already handed down a decision for counterfeiting the photograph &#8220;Enfants&#8221;, the work of the photographer Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Bauret, and previously, in the early 1990s, it was in the United States that he was censured for plagiarism by his sculpture \u00ab Strings of Puppies \u00bb<i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(3) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\">Another sculpture exhibited during a<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">\u00a0<b>retrospective<\/b><\/span>\u00a0devoted to\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>Jeff Koons\u00a0<\/b><\/span>at\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>the Centre<\/b>\u00a0<b>Pompidou<\/b><\/span>\u00a0in 2014 is at the origin of the present dispute. The sculpture in question, depicting a young woman lying in the snow with, at her head, a pig carrying a barrel, like a Saint Bernard, and two penguins, was inspired by an advertising graphic created by<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">\u00a0<b>Franck Davidovici<\/b><\/span>, a freelance artist, for the\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>Naf-Naf Company<\/b><\/span>. The first and second works were both titled &#8220;Fait d&#8217;hiver&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\"><strong><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">The graphic by Franck Davidovici<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-5045\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"102\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><strong>The sculpture by Jeff Koons<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p data-testid=\"MtRtXsMRrsQu\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-5046\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Koons-e1616154108805.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"180\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">Franck Davidovici then sued the Centre Pompidou and Jeff Koons for\u00a0<strong><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">copyright<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0infringement and won the case before the High Court of Paris. The decision of the latter has now been confirmed by the Paris Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">The Appeal Court considered that the first work, the photograph by Franck Davidovici, was\u00a0<strong><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">original<\/span><\/strong>. The Appeal Court acknowledged differences between the two works but decided that the similarities between them were predominant. \u00a0It did not accept Jeff Koons&#8217; defence, based in particular on the parody exception and freedom of artistic expression.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>On the Parody Exception<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">The Appeal Court recalled that, according to the\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><a class=\"link-build-content\" style=\"color: #013ca6;\" href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/HTML\/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0201&amp;from=EN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><u>established case law of the CJEU<\/u><\/a><\/span><i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(4) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>, for the parody exception to be established,\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>three criteria must be satisfied<\/b><\/span>: &#8220;the secondary work must evoke an existing work, the secondary work must not be liable to be confused with the primary work&#8221; and &#8220;must constitute a manifestation of humour or mockery&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">In this case, the Court notes that Jeff Koons&#8217; description of his own sculpture\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>did not enable any expression of humour or mockery to be discerned<\/b><\/span>. Moreover, in the absence of any reference or comment, his intention to evoke the pre-existing photograph had not been demonstrated, especially as the latter dated from 1985 and had been\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>forgotten<\/b><\/span>\u00a0or unknown to\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>the exhibition\u2019s attendees<\/b><\/span>, so that they could not refer to it when they saw the sculpture.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>On a Right to Freedom of Artistic Expression in France<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">Jeff Koons had also asserted his right to freedom of artistic expression by invoking\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><a class=\"link-build-content\" style=\"color: #013ca6;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coe.int\/en\/web\/conventions\/full-list\/-\/conventions\/rms\/0900001680063765\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><u>Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms<\/u><\/a><\/span><i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(5) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>\u00a0and citing the Klasen case law of 15 May 2015<i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><sub><strong><em>(6) <\/em><\/strong><\/sub><\/span><\/i>, which henceforth requires the French judge\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>to balance<\/b><\/span>\u00a0freedom of expression and copyright law through\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>a concrete assessment of facts<\/b><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">It should be noted that this balancing is likely to obstruct the &#8220;<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>appropriationist<\/b><\/span>&#8221; movement that Jeff Koons has always defended. This artistic movement, which was born in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, consists for an author in appropriating an object or a pre-<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>existing work without seeking the authorisation<\/b><\/span>\u00a0of the author of the original work and making it his own as part of a\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>reflection<\/b><\/span>\u00a0on the world of art and its principles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">Thus, for Jeff Koons, the disputed statue, which is part of the &#8220;Banality&#8221; series, conveys a\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>message that is very different<\/b>\u00a0<\/span>from that of the advertising montage produced for Naf-Naf, which is not contested by Mr Davidovici. It &#8220;allows him to construct a story on Banality as Rescuer&#8221;, &#8220;banality being embodied here in addition to borrowings from popular culture by a harmless farm animal&#8230; which comes to the rescue of humanity represented by the reclining woman. This banality comes to the rescue of the young woman by leading her to accept herself as she is, naked and free of any guilt or fear of being judged\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">The Appeal Court noted that Jeff Koons&#8217; message, even if it is &#8220;a reflection of a social nature,\u00a0<b><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">falls within the scope of freedom of artistic expression<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>or artistic creation and not within the scope of freedom of expression in the area of political discourse or issues of general interest&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">It recalled that freedom of artistic expression must be exercised &#8220;with full\u00a0<b><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">respect for other fundamental rights<\/span>\u00a0<\/b>such as the right of ownership from which copyright arises&#8221; and concluded that &#8220;there is no circumstance that justifies Jeff Koons, who himself occupies a leading position on the art market, failing to find out who was the author of the photograph he intended to use as inspiration, in order to obtain his authorisation&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">Thus the implementation of copyright protection for the photograph &#8220;Fait d&#8217;hiver&#8221; constitutes\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>a proportionate and necessary infringement of Jeff Koons&#8217; freedom of artistic expression<\/b><\/span>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>On the condemnation of the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">The Centre Georges Pompidou was also condemned alongside Jeff Koons. The Appeal Court first reiterated that infringement is characterised, independently of any fault or bad faith, by the reproduction, representation or exploitation of a work of the mind in violation of the property rights attached to it and that Mr Davidovici is therefore entitled to seek to establish\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>the Centre&#8217;s liability<\/b><\/span>. It then pointed out that, as a\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>professional establishment<\/b>,<\/span> it was up to the Centre to ensure before the exhibition and the disputed publications that the works of Jeff Koons, in particular the sculpture &#8220;Fait d&#8217;hiver&#8221;, were not likely to infringe the rights of others and in any case to obtain a guarantee on this point from the artist and his company.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">For the exhibition of the disputed sculpture and its reproduction in books, an amount of 190,000 Euros\u00a0<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><b>in damages to compensate for the infringement of moral and patrimonial rights<\/b><\/span>, higher than the first instance award, is allocated to Franck Davidovici, a sum for which the Centre Georges Pompidou is liable to pay 20% in solidum, in addition to the costs. The Centre Georges Pompidou<span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">\u00a0<b>is also prohibited from exhibiting<\/b><\/span>\u00a0the sculpture or reproducing it in any way, including on websites, or else incur a fine of 600\u20ac per infringement and per day.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\">After this decision, French museums will perhaps think twice before exhibiting \u00ab appropriationist \u00bb creations, and will in any case make sure they have the necessary guarantees, as the risk of being condemned to pay substantial damages for infringement is no longer a fiction&#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>Footnotes:<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(1)<\/b><\/i><\/span><i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">\u00a0<\/span>CA Paris 23 February 2021 n\u00b0 19\/09059<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(2)\u00a0<\/b><\/i><\/span><i>CA Paris 17 September 2019, n\u00b0 17\/09695<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(3)<\/b><\/i><\/span><i><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\">\u00a0<\/span>Cf. Le Monde 23 December 2019 \u00ab Jeff Koons a nouveau condamn\u00e9 pour contrefa\u00e7on \u00bb<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(4)<\/b><\/i><\/span><i>\u00a0CJEU, 3 September 2014, C-201\/13, Deckmyn.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(5)\u00a0<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><i>1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><i>2 The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"text-build-content\" data-testid=\"bUYaYjE1D\"><span style=\"color: #013ca6;\"><i><b>(6)\u00a0<\/b><\/i><\/span><i>Cass. Civ. 1\u00e8re, 15 May 2015, n\u00b013-27391<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a class=\"btn\" href=\"mailto:contact@bdl-ip.com\">CONTACT AN EXPERT <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230;or the Balance between Artistic Movements, Free Artistic Expression and Copyright Law On 23 February(1) \u00a0the Paris Court of Appeal\u00a0upheld the decision of the High Court of Paris of 8 November 2018\u00a0condemning the American visual artist, the highly-rated Jeff Koons, and the Centre Pompidou in Paris\u00a0for infringing\u00a0a Naf-Naf advertising campaign dating from 1985. This is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[317],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ip-news-ja"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>2021\/03 &gt; Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2021\/03 &gt; Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&#8230;or the Balance between Artistic Movements, Free Artistic Expression and Copyright Law On 23 February(1) \u00a0the Paris Court of Appeal\u00a0upheld the decision of the High Court of Paris of 8 November 2018\u00a0condemning the American visual artist, the highly-rated Jeff Koons, and the Centre Pompidou in Paris\u00a0for infringing\u00a0a Naf-Naf advertising campaign dating from 1985. This is [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BDL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"adm-bdl\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"adm-bdl\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"adm-bdl\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159\"},\"headline\":\"2021\\\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1272,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"IP NEWS\"],\"inLanguage\":\"jp\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/\",\"name\":\"2021\\\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"jp\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"jp\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2021\\\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/\",\"name\":\"BDL\",\"description\":\"Un site utilisant WordPress\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"jp\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159\",\"name\":\"adm-bdl\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"jp\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"adm-bdl\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bdl-ip.com\\\/ja\\\/author\\\/adm-bdl\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL","og_description":"&#8230;or the Balance between Artistic Movements, Free Artistic Expression and Copyright Law On 23 February(1) \u00a0the Paris Court of Appeal\u00a0upheld the decision of the High Court of Paris of 8 November 2018\u00a0condemning the American visual artist, the highly-rated Jeff Koons, and the Centre Pompidou in Paris\u00a0for infringing\u00a0a Naf-Naf advertising campaign dating from 1985. This is [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/","og_site_name":"BDL","article_published_time":"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"adm-bdl","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"adm-bdl","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/"},"author":{"name":"adm-bdl","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/#\/schema\/person\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159"},"headline":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art","datePublished":"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/"},"wordCount":1272,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png","articleSection":["IP NEWS"],"inLanguage":"jp"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/","url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/","name":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art - BDL","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png","datePublished":"2021-03-30T16:31:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/#\/schema\/person\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"jp","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"jp","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Franck-D-e1616154050196.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/2021-03-counterfeiting-and-appropriation-art\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2021\/03 > Counterfeiting and Appropriation Art"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/","name":"BDL","description":"Un site utilisant WordPress","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"jp"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/#\/schema\/person\/49791463b136dcd0ba2792015bd1d159","name":"adm-bdl","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"jp","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/939382c24f608c82daf1a778542f77d26f1809bbcd119007d5cd89180d7687ce?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"adm-bdl"},"url":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/author\/adm-bdl\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8429\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bdl-ip.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}